{"id":1089,"date":"2023-10-17T20:36:25","date_gmt":"2023-10-17T20:36:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mrfound3r.io\/blog\/?p=1089"},"modified":"2025-09-04T23:24:15","modified_gmt":"2025-09-04T23:24:15","slug":"flash-vetting-the-hidden-cost-cutting-secret-in-virtual-staffing-agencies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mrfound3r.io\/blog\/2023\/10\/17\/flash-vetting-the-hidden-cost-cutting-secret-in-virtual-staffing-agencies\/","title":{"rendered":"Flash-Vetting: The Hidden Cost-Cutting Secret in Virtual Staffing Agencies"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\u201cFlash-Vetting,\u201d an insider term coined by virtual staffing agencies, refers to a speedy, cost-effective recruitment tactic.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

However, the hidden long-term implications of this method can be alarming.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

On the surface, Flash-Vetting appears to be an attractive option to many agencies due to its potential for massive cost savings.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

With this rapid-fire approach, an agency can cut the cost of hiring a technical professional, such as a web developer, graphic designer, or video animator, by almost 50%, reducing the expense from an estimated $7,000 per hire to a mere $3,500.<\/span><\/p>

To put this in perspective, consider a virtual staffing agency that needs to hire 100 technical professionals in a year.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

By resorting to Flash-Vetting, the agency could potentially save up to $350,000 annually, which seems like an undeniable win in the short-term fiscal game.<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

The Financial Reality of Comprehensive Vetting: A $7,000 Investment in Quality Assurance<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Navigating the complex landscape of hiring technical professionals such as web developers, graphic designers, and video animators requires a nuanced approach.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

With a plethora of checks and assessments, the comprehensive vetting process totals up to a hefty $7,000 per hire.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Let\u2019s break down the costs that contribute to this significant investment.<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

The Integral Role of Background Checks and Aptitude, Personality, Technical and Language Tests in Comprehensive Vetting<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Each of these measures comes at a cost but contributes to a well-rounded understanding of the candidate\u2019s suitability.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

For instance, a standard background check might cost around $30 to $80 per candidate. Meanwhile, aptitude, personality, technical, and language tests can range from $20 to $150 each.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Considering the necessity of these assessments for every potential hire, this could account for approximately $300 to $1,000 of the total vetting cost.<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

The Weight of HR Interviews, Psychological Tests, Technical Interviews, and Internal Reviews in the $7,000 Comprehensive Vetting Cost<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

A robust interview process is crucial in assessing a candidate\u2019s potential. HR interviews can cost around $100 per hour with at least two hours per candidate, adding $200 per hire.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Psychological tests may range from $50 to $200, depending on the test\u2019s complexity and relevance. Technical interviews, involving senior professionals, can add another $200 to $400 to the bill.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Lastly, the internal review process, which involves time and resources from multiple team members, can easily add up to $500. Collectively, these stages contribute to nearly $1,500 of the vetting cost.<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

A Deep Dive into Flash-Vetting: Trimming Hiring Costs to $3,500 Through Expedited Processes<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Flash-Vetting is an attractive prospect for agencies looking to trim down the expenses associated with hiring.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

However, reducing costs to approximately $3,500 per hire comes with its own set of compromises.<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

How Flash-Vetting Bypasses Traditional Vetting Components to Cut Costs<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Flash-Vetting often streamlines or entirely bypasses stages like background checks and aptitude or technical tests.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

This may reduce the cost associated with these assessments by half or even more. For example, a streamlined background check may only cost $15 to $40, and a simplified testing process may only amount to $100 to $500 per hire.<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

The Cost-Benefit Analysis: Flash-Vetting's Impact on HR Interviews, Psychological Tests, Technical Interviews, and Internal Reviews<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

In the Flash-Vetting process, the interview and review stages are often condensed, reducing the overall cost.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

HR interviews might be limited to an hour or less, costing around $50 to $100. Similarly, psychological tests may be omitted, and technical interviews might involve less experienced, thus less costly, professionals, costing around $100 to $200. An expedited internal review may only amount to $200, further lowering the cost of hiring.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

This expedited process can effectively cut down the cost of hiring by 50%, amounting to approximately $3,500 per hire.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

However, the potential for oversight and the risk of compromising on hire quality remains high.<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

The Accountability Void: Recruiters' Indifference Costs Marketing Agencies Severly<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

When examining the intricate operations of virtual staffing agencies, a significant factor emerges that has dramatic implications for their clients: recruiters\u2019 detachment from the performance of their placements.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

This \u201caccountability void\u201d plays a significant role in escalating the hidden costs borne by marketing agency owners. <\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Immune to Consequences: The Price of Recruiter Indifference<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

In the ecosystem of virtual staffing, recruiters often operate with a seemingly laissez-faire attitude towards the aftermath of their hiring decisions.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

The unfortunate reality is that these recruiters face no repercussions if their placed technical hires, such as web developers, graphic designers, or video animators, underperform.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Consider a scenario where a poorly vetted web developer takes 25% longer to complete tasks compared to a thoroughly vetted counterpart.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

In this case, the underperformance, on a six-month project billed at $75 per hour for a 40-hour week, would translate to a whopping additional cost of $15,000 for the marketing agency.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

And remember, this cost does not take into account the cascading effects like project delays, missed deadlines, and potential client losses.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Despite these significant consequences, recruiters remain insulated from any fallout, and thus, their motivation to ensure their placements\u2019 success is inherently compromised. <\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

The Drive for Quotas: A Breeding Ground for Flash-Vetting<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

The crux of this indifference lies in the relentless pressures that recruiters face to fulfill challenging quotas, often placing as many as 20 technical professionals per month.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

This quota-driven environment pushes recruiters to opt for speed over accuracy, emphasizing the quantity of placements over the quality.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

In such a high-pressure scenario, Flash-Vetting becomes an appealing strategy. Its efficiency and cost-effectiveness enable recruiters to meet their quotas within the hiring budget, thereby solidifying its prominence in their recruitment arsenal.<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

The Hidden Cost Savers: How Staffing Agencies Profit at the Expense of Marketing Agencies<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

For the virtual staffing agencies themselves, Flash-Vetting serves as a method to save substantially on hiring costs.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

As previously mentioned, the use of Flash-Vetting could potentially save these agencies up to $350,000 per year.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

However, this saving comes at the expense of their clients \u2013 marketing agency owners.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

These agency owners bear the brunt of underperforming hires and the ensuing financial drain, a situation further exacerbated by the recruiters\u2019 indifference to these implications.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

This arrangement calls for a fundamental reconsideration of hiring practices within the staffing industry to create a more equitable balance of responsibility.<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

The Lure of Cost-Savings: A Misguided Incentive?<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

In an environment where recruiters are under immense pressure to fill quotas, Flash-Vetting presents an appealing cost-effective solution.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

But does the potential saving of hundreds of thousands of dollars for the staffing agency truly justify the risks?<\/span><\/p>

Let\u2019s go back to our previous example.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

If a staffing agency uses Flash-Vetting to hire 100 technical professionals annually, they save around $350,000.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

But this saving could quickly evaporate if even 10% of these hires underperform and cost their clients an extra $16,000 each in project delays, adding up to a total loss of $160,000.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

This doesn\u2019t even factor in the potential damage to client relationships and reputation.<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

The Path Forward: Effective Hiring Strategies for Marketing Agencies<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

In this complex ecosystem where cost-saving measures often compromise the quality of placements and create burdensome hidden costs, it\u2019s clear that an alternative approach to hiring is required.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

An approach that prioritizes quality over speed, an approach that establishes an effective balance of responsibility, and an approach that ultimately serves to protect the interests of marketing agency owners. <\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Mr. Found3r: A Case for Comprehensive Vetting and Quality Assurance<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Enter Mr. Found3r, a virtual staffing agency that is revolutionizing the hiring game by challenging the prevalent Flash-Vetting norm.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

This agency places a strong emphasis on comprehensive vetting, which involves meticulous attention to all aspects of hiring \u2013 from aptitude and technical tests to thorough HR interviews and internal reviews.<\/span><\/p>

By refusing to compromise on the quality of their hires, Mr. Found3r ensures that only the best-fit candidates join their clients\u2019 teams.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

In this scenario, a web developer, graphic designer, or video animator would only be placed after passing a series of exhaustive assessments, ensuring they are well equipped to perform their tasks efficiently.<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Weighing the Costs: How Comprehensive Vetting Boosts Productivity and Saves Resources<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Let\u2019s revisit the case of a poorly vetted web developer who took 25% longer to complete tasks.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

In contrast, a web developer vetted by Mr. Found3r would likely perform tasks within the expected time frame, if not faster, due to their proven competence.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

This improved performance eliminates the hidden costs associated with underperformance, which, as demonstrated earlier, could save a marketing agency upwards of $15,000 on a single project.<\/span><\/p>

Moreover, the elimination of potential project delays and the risk of losing clients due to missed deadlines further amplifies these savings.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

By avoiding Flash-Vetting, Mr. Found3r provides marketing agency owners with a significant return on investment, saving them valuable time and financial resources.<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Peace of Mind: The Intangible Benefit of Mr. Found3r\u2019s Approach<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Beyond the quantifiable benefits of comprehensive vetting, Mr. Found3r\u2019s approach also offers marketing agency owners an invaluable intangible benefit \u2013 peace of mind.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Knowing that the agency has thoroughly assessed each candidate and confirmed their competence to perform the job at hand eliminates the fear of potential underperformance.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

In this regard, Mr. Found3r\u2019s focus on comprehensive vetting serves not just as a cost-saving measure but as a safeguard for the marketing agency\u2019s reputation and its relationships with clients.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

As such, Mr. Found3r\u2019s commitment to quality assurance presents a compelling case for moving away from Flash-Vetting and towards more responsible, beneficial hiring practices.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

The takeaway is clear: while Flash-Vetting might offer immediate cost savings, the hidden long-term costs and potential pitfalls far outweigh these short-term benefits.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

As marketing agencies navigate the complex hiring landscape, embracing a comprehensive vetting approach like that of Mr. Found3r can lead to a higher return on investment, better productivity, and the crucial peace of mind that comes with knowing you have a reliable, competent team in place.<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Flash-Vetting: The Hidden Cost-Cutting Secret in Virtual Staffing Agencies<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Summary:\u00a0<\/b><\/p>

Flash-Vetting, a quick recruitment strategy, offers huge cost savings for virtual staffing agencies. While it reduces hiring costs by up to 50%, the long-term repercussions on hiring quality can be significant. The article highlights the extensive costs and procedures of traditional vetting, contrasts it with the streamlined Flash-Vetting, and points out potential pitfalls like compromised hiring quality and hidden costs to marketing agencies. The piece concludes by presenting Mr. Found3r\u2019s approach to comprehensive vetting as an effective, reliable alternative.<\/span><\/p>

Main Points:<\/span><\/p>

  1. Flash-Vetting Explained:<\/span><\/li><\/ol>

    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2013 A method for quick, cost-effective recruitment.<\/span><\/p>

    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2013 Potential for 50% cost savings, reducing the hiring cost from $7,000 to $3,500 per technical professional.<\/span><\/p>

    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2013 Annual savings could be up to $350,000 for an agency hiring 100 technical professionals.<\/span><\/p>

    1. Comprehensive Vetting Cost Breakdown:<\/span><\/li><\/ol>

      \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2013 Total cost: $7,000 per hire.<\/span><\/p>

      \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2013 Components include background checks, aptitude, personality, technical and language tests, HR interviews, psychological tests, technical interviews, and internal reviews.<\/span><\/p>

      1. Flash-Vetting\u2019s Shortcomings:<\/span><\/li><\/ol>

        \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2013 Often omits or streamlines important vetting steps, compromising the understanding of a candidate\u2019s suitability.<\/span><\/p>

        \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2013 Streamlined background checks and simplified testing processes cut costs but increase risk.<\/span><\/p>

        \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2013 Interview and review processes are condensed, further reducing costs but compromising on quality.<\/span><\/p>

        1. The Accountability Issue:<\/span><\/li><\/ol>

          \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2013 Virtual staffing recruiters often don\u2019t bear the consequences of poor hiring decisions, leading to an \u201caccountability void\u201d.<\/span><\/p>

          \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2013 Poorly vetted technical professionals can underperform, causing project delays and additional costs to marketing agencies.<\/span><\/p>

          \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2013 Recruiters are driven by challenging quotas, making Flash-Vetting appealing due to its speed and cost-effectiveness.<\/span><\/p>

          1. Cost Implications for Marketing Agencies:<\/span><\/li><\/ol>

            \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2013 Virtual staffing agencies profit from Flash-Vetting, but the cost of poor hiring falls on marketing agencies.<\/span><\/p>

            \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2013 Even a 10% underperformance rate in hires can cause significant financial losses, damaging client relationships and reputation.<\/span><\/p>

            1. Alternative Approach \u2013 Mr. Found3r:<\/span><\/li><\/ol>

              \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2013 An agency that prioritizes comprehensive vetting.<\/span><\/p>

              \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2013 Focuses on exhaustive assessments, ensuring only competent candidates are placed.<\/span><\/p>

              \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2013 Candidates vetted through this method perform tasks efficiently, saving marketing agencies time and money.<\/span><\/p>

              \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2013 Provides marketing agency owners peace of mind, safeguarding their reputation and relationships with clients.<\/span><\/p>

              1. Conclusion:<\/span><\/li><\/ol>

                \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2013 While Flash-Vetting offers immediate savings, its hidden long-term costs are detrimental.<\/span><\/p>

                \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2013 Comprehensive vetting, like Mr. Found3r\u2019s approach, ensures higher ROI, better productivity, and reliability in hires.<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"\u201cFlash-Vetting,\u201d an insider term coined by virtual staffing agencies, refers to a…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1090,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1089","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-business"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mrfound3r.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1089","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mrfound3r.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mrfound3r.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mrfound3r.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mrfound3r.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1089"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/mrfound3r.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1089\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1101,"href":"https:\/\/mrfound3r.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1089\/revisions\/1101"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mrfound3r.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1090"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mrfound3r.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1089"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mrfound3r.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1089"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mrfound3r.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1089"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}